Friday, November 7, 2008

When minorities turn to bigotry

November 4, 2008 marked a momentous day in United States history, while also serving as a black day for civil rights in California. By a majority of votes, Californians saw fit to strip Gays and Lesbians of their constitutional right to same-sex marriage under the state constitution, granted by the state's Supreme Court.

What is most despicable about this result is the participation of visible minorities, including African-Americans, Hispanic Americans and Asian Americans in supporting this discriminatory measure. Certainly while many amongst these communities didn't support this, exit polls suggest that a large portion of African Americans in particular voted in favour of Proposition 8.

Visible minorities ought to know better than to support discriminatory measures that deprive a class of people of certain rights. Japanese Americans were targeted for internment during World War Two. African Americans were once prohibited from marrying Whites, until the state Supreme Court ruled that such laws deprived them of equal protection under the state constitution. This was practiced in other states including Virginia until the United States Supreme Court declared such laws unconstitutional in 1967. This took place many years ago, but imagine if ballot initiatives were available back then which would permit changing the state constitution to deprive African Americans from marrying whomever they chose to, thus invalidating the rights granted by the court?

However, this bigotry isn't restricted to African Americans in California and the United States. In Canada, during the run-up to Parliament passing legislation permitting same-sex marriages across the country, numerous religious and ethnic minorities, including those from the south Asian community, voiced their opposition to same-sex marriage, in addition to the usual bunch of White religious hate mongers. Thankfully, Parliament stood firm and followed through.

I would simply say that members of visible minorities who support prohibition of same-sex marriages ought to ask themselves how much they value their right to equality when applied to them, and realize the damage they have perpetrated to the cause of equal protection and human rights in the United States.

Wednesday, November 5, 2008

Transposing Political Change

With the election of Senator Barack Obama as the first African-American President, a Canadian friend of mine (very) recently asked/commented on her Facebook status message the following: "X (my friend) wants Canadians to imagine how likely they'd be to elect an Aboriginal or First Nations PM...Hmmm..."

Prior to yesterday evening, one of the things I imagined that his victory would bring, would be a sense of possibility - that people of color could not only be elected to high office, but also aspire to run for such office(s) in greater numbers and perhaps participate more vigourously in the process. President-elect Obama isn't the only person of color to be sure to accede to important government positions: Governor Deval Patrick of Massachusetts (D), Governor Bill Richardson of New Mexico (D), Governor Bobby Jindal of Louisiana (R), and a whole host of members of Congress.

But to return to my friend's query, I think that in order for voters in Canada or other countries to imagine electing an individual, who belongs to a member of a traditionally perceived "other" community, I think it requires a significant diminishment of that person's "otherness" or perceived otherness. It has been said of course that the reason many White voters have been drawn to Obama is that "he isn't really Black" or that the way he speaks is more White than Black - a notion which is highly problematic and will be the subject of a later post. But one of the things that separated Obama and made him a viable candidate for so many, was that he was different from earlier African-American Democratic presidential candidates (i.e. Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton). The identity of being 'post-racial' - of being able to move beyond an identity politics - the ability to be more inclusive. Obama rarely brought up race in the election, it was only when he had to address remarks made by Reverend Jeremiah Wright that he launched into what many considered an important statement on race.

But yet I don't think it is entirely impossible to imagine a similar circumstance in other countries. But in order to do so, you will need an individual who can get the voting public to suspend (in large enough numbers) their own entrenched caricatures of what other people can or ought to be. I think a person of colour or an Aboriginal Canadian could potentially do the trick were they able to do a number of things. First, they would have to project themselves more broadly as a Canadian (who happens to be) of aboriginal/First Nations descent (or pick an ethnicity of choice) rather than as an Aboriginal/First Nations-Canadian or other hyphenated designation.

Second, one of the important aspects of Obama's candidacy was that he did not cater to a politics or perceived politics of ethnic grievance. It goes without saying that Aboriginal/First Nations Canadians have much to be angry about, as did/do African-Americans. Yet there is no way Obama would have won if he spoke much about these grievances. This isn't necessarily a good thing or a bad thing, yet it is a political reality.

The case of an Aboriginal Canadian becoming Prime Minister of Canada could be particularly challenging because for many Canadians, Aboriginal Canadians are more often associated with seeking greater independence and autonomy from 'Canadian society' and self governance while receiving money from the state. An Aboriginal Canadian would have to overcome such perceptions.

Even with other visible minorities, the climb to become head of a national party isn't easy either. While there are members of Parliament from visible minorities, there are some if not many who represent constituencies that are primarily comprised of their own ethnic community in addition to others. I think if a member of a visible minority were to break out and run for a leadership position, a real challenge would be to gain support outside of their insular space.

All that said, what made Obama's run so unique was his own individual ability to communicate and his eloquence, an ability to attract people of so many different backgrounds, an ability that few people possess, Black, White, Asian, Hispanic or Aboriginal. It will require the ability to speak in an accent and a voice that doesn't scream "foreign" all over it, a voice that won't take too much adjusting to. Of course there is a double standard involved because we need only hear the majestic erudition that flows from the mouth of George W. Bush to recognize that the same rules don't apply to minority candidates. Had Obama possessed the same speaking skills or accent as the current president, I doubt he would have even won his state senate seat in Illinois, much less what was to follow.

Notwithstanding the hurdles though, Obama's victory provides individuals of colour with a type of pathway (with necessary adjustments for local/national) circumstances that could lead to victory.

A Moment in Time

Senator (now President-elect) Barack Obama will be the 44th President of the United States on January 20, 2009. It marks a momentous time not only for African-Americans, the country-at-large, but also the world. For many it marks the beginning of an opportunity to engage with an intelligent, thoughtful administration led by a cosmopolitan, transformative figure.



President-elect Obama first propelled himself through his keynote address to the Democratic National Convention in Boston in 2004. I might add it may have been one of Senator John Kerry's most important and eventful decisions (as the Presidential nominee of the Democratic Party) for it exposed the country and the world to a new light and inspiration that was seeking to break through the darkness of the Bush administration. His campaign had been marked with considerable discipline and had bested several political veterans - including his own Vice-Presidential-elect, Senator Joe Biden, not to mention Senators John McCain and Hillary Clinton.



His victory signifies the idea that many of the things that we believe are impossible - are indeed possible. With a great deal of determination, perseverance and intelligence, the greatest of accomplishments are achievable. When his victory was called - I experienced a sense of empowerment - that anything was within my grasp if I chose to work for it. Yes it is very hokey.



But the sense of empowerment is what helps move people to do great things and affect others positively through their efforts.

One can only hope that Obama's win will impact and inspire others to take part or engage in politics in a similar manner.